Continuity of care and chronicity in medical students' education: 'adopt' a chronic patient.

Purpose: Nowadays chronicity is one of the most frequent aspects of care doctors have to deal with. Students need to know and learn clinical, relational, social and managerial elements of chronicity and changes that disease causes in patients, families and doctors themselves. Methods: Students are supervised by a family doctor, in taking care of 'their' patient and of his/her family. They are asked to keep an updated diary, participate in the periodical revision of the medical history and write an end-report. Two focus groups were conducted, adopting a constructive qualitative approach in order to analyse results. Results: The focus groups and the SWOT analysis show common themes such as innovative learning and multidisciplinary approach. Clinical evolution of the disease, mental and body changes and the diagnostic and therapeutic future planning were also revealed. Conclusions: The main goal of this innovation was understanding the importance of a continuous clinical relationship and of the role of the doctor as 'therapy itself'. The project was demonstrated to be able to teach the future physicians how to practice more empathetic medicine and to improve the skills needed in a complex relational environment including that of chronic disease.

A meta-synthesis study of the key elements involved in childhood vaccine hesitancy.

OBJECTIVES: Immunization is one of the most successful and cost-effective interventions to improve health outcomes. However, internationally, the phenomenon of parental vaccine hesitancy is increasing and presents a growing challenge for health professionals. This article summarizes the evidence surrounding childhood vaccine hesitancy from the perspective of parents. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. METHODS: We searched for qualitative research articles in electronic databases from inception to March 2018. In addition, a manual search of the retrieved articles and their references was conducted to identify other potential articles. We used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme to examine study validity, adequacy and potential applicability of the results. No articles were excluded for reasons of quality. By performing a meta-synthesis, we identified descriptive themes and, subsequently, the conceptual elements of vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: The review included 27 studies involving a total of 1557 parents who were hesitant about vaccinating their child. Five overarching categories were identified: (1) risk conceptualization; (2) mistrust towards vaccine-related institutions, pharmaceutical companies, researchers, health professionals and the information from media; (3) parental alternative health beliefs about childhood immunity, vaccine scheduling and the perceived toxicity of vaccinations; (4) philosophical views on parental responsibility; and (5) parents' information levels about vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare providers need to approach this difficult situation considering that parents desire to do what they feel right for the child. Understanding the core elements of hesitancy will allow health professionals to adopt effective communication and behavioural strategies.

Improving the quality of communication during handover in a Paediatric Emergency Department: a qualitative pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: There is a dearth of literature that specifically addresses the handover reporting process among healthcare staff working in children's Emergency Department (ED). Widespread gaps in service provision, such as gaps in communication in handover reports to ambulance staff have been noted in the general literature on the topic. There are also improvements observed in handover when a structured mnemonic was encouraged. Structured reports improve communication, safety and may reduce medication errors. Thus, the improvement of handover reporting in children's ED has important implications for children's healthcare practice. However, little is known about communication processes during handover reports in Italian children's ED or its consequences for errors or risks. METHODS: A qualitative description methodology was used. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from five children's ED nurses. Thematic content analysis was used to identify common themes. RESULTS: Emergent themes were: interpersonal influences on handover; structural issues; and local contextual factors. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this pilot study prompted the need for a standardized tool that improves communication during handover. As such, standardizing the communication process during handover could be effectively resolved by using a mnemonic tool adapted for handover in a paediatric emergency department.

Pathologist's assistant (PathA) and his/her role in the surgical pathology department: a systematic review and a narrative synthesis.

In recent decades, various highly qualified individuals have increasingly performed tasks that have historically been handled by physicians with the aim of reducing their workload. Over time, however, these "physician assistants" or "physician extenders" have gained more and more responsibilities, showing that specific tasks can be performed equally skilfully by specialised health care professionals. The pathologist's assistant (PathA) is a highly qualified technician who works alongside the pathologist and is responsible for the grossing and autopsies. This profession was developed in the USA, with formal training programmes starting in 1970 when Dr. Kinney, director of the Department of Pathology of Duke University, Durham, NC, started the first dedicated course. Most institutes in the USA and Canada currently employ these technical personnel for grossing, and numerous papers published over the years demonstrate the quality of the assistance provided by the PathA, which is equal to or sometimes even better than the performance of pathologists. The PathA can be employed to carry out a wide range of tasks to assist the pathologist, such as grossing (the description and reduction of surgical specimens), judicial autopsies and administrative and supervisory practices within the laboratory or assistance in research, although the diagnosis is always the pathologist's responsibility. Since this role has already been consolidated in North America, part of the relevant literature is altogether out of date. However, the situation is different in Europe, where there is an increasing interest in PathA, mainly because of the benefits of their inclusion in anatomic pathology laboratories. In the UK, biomedical scientists (BMS, the British equivalent of PathA) are involved in many tasks both in surgical pathology and in cytopathology, which are generally performed by medically trained staff. Several papers have been recently published to highlight the role of BMS with the broader public. This report aimed to conduct a systematic review of all the articles published about the PathA/BMS and to perform a narrative synthesis. The results may contribute to the evidence for including the PAthA/BMS within a surgical pathology laboratory organisation.